Triangle of Sadness

2022 - 9 - 21

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Film School Rejects"

'Triangle of Sadness' Desperately Wants What 'Parasite' Has (Film School Rejects)

It's always fun when a film with THIS much projectile vomit wins the Palme. Triangle Of Sadness. By Meg Shields · Published on September 21st, 2022. As part of ...

The film is as bloated and excessive as the ultra-rich it’s ostensibly ribbing. For all its boons, Triangle of Sadness fails to justify either its cynicism or its length. You’d think that a film this long wouldn’t leave you wanting more of a character, and yet here we are. If there is a silver lining, it might be that the brilliant But Triangle of Sadness’ bloated length and its reticence to get any skin in the game make it come across as sloppy, if not outright complicit. In the end, it’s frustrating that Triangle fails to manifest as more than the sum of its parts… But there’s no way about it: Triangle of Sadness is like being bonked over the head with a battering ram for two and a half hours. It doesn’t help that Triangle of Sadness isn’t really all that interested in using its corpulent runtime to offer us anything in the way of a counterpoint as to how, exactly, we’re supposed to eat the rich. But being blunt and obvious for 149 minutes is either a war crime or a mighty big ask of your audience. A lot of folks like feeling validated and unchallenged in their socio-political beliefs, however basic. The most profound thing Triangle of Sadness has to say amounts to a “boy howdy, conspicuous consumption is pretty gross, huh?” And it’s like, yeah, Ruben. The film’s satire is about as sophisticated as, well, a bunch of overindulgent socialites spewing glittering vomit all over a luxury yacht.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Variety"

Ruben Ostlund's Palme d'Or Winning 'Triangle of Sadness' Sells ... (Variety)

Ruben Östlund's Palme d'Or winning film 'Triangle of Sadness' has been sold by Coproduction Office to major distributors around the world.

Besides Neon, the film was sold to U.K. SF Studios will distribute the film in the Nordics. Recent deals have been closed with Stay Golden (China), Edko (Hong Kong), Impact (India), Gaga (Japan), Green Narae (South Korea), Catchplay (Taiwan), TBA Studios (Philippines), Sun (Latin America), Frontrow (Middle East), Forefront (South Africa) and Les Films 26 (French-speaking Africa), A-Plus (Bulgaria), Anticipate (Singapore), Falcon (Indonesia) and Sahamongkol (Thailand).

Post cover
Image courtesy of "The Madison Leader Gazette"

Ruben Ostlund's Cannes Winning 'Triangle of Sadness' Sells ... (The Madison Leader Gazette)

Ruben Östlund's Palme d'Or winning film “Triangle of Sadness” has been sold by Coproduction Office to major distributors around the world.

Besides Neon, the film was sold to U.K. SF Studios will distribute the film in the Nordics. Coproduction Office has now sold the movie worldwide to major distributors.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Worldakkam.com"

Movie Review: Triangle of Sorrow (Worldakkam.com)

Having enjoyed Ruben Östlund's two critically acclaimed satires so far (Force Majeure, The Square), I was ecstatic given the fact that the film won the Palme D' ...

Östlund is content to stay on the level of youthful enjoyment, capturing wealth and privilege in cheap shots. The yacht portion of the film culminates in a dinner scene that leads to vomiting and diarrhea for almost everyone involved, and the alcoholic, self-proclaimed Marxist captain gets caught in a play on words with a Russian manure tycoon. The crew is instructed to satisfy every whim of the rich man in exchange for a bonus at the end of the cruise. This part of the film is episodic and increasingly radical, making constant comical jabs at the rich man’s ignorance and capriciousness, but the jabs are mostly juvenile. A Filipino toilet cleaner called Abigail sits at the bottom of the yacht hierarchy, taking on a leadership role as the only person in the group capable of fishing and igniting fear. In a scene reminiscent of The Wolf of Wall Street, he is shown to have the same values as the rich – making money and chanting “Money, gold, gold!” singing in unison. As Abigail is a new character we’ve hardly seen before, she’s yet another stereotype, this time standing in for the world’s poor and downtrodden. So the beauty of the couple, like everything else in the film, is a form of currency, a commodity. It’s the film that Cannes directors and critics have decided is the best film here, and it’s bad. . Instead, the couple will be merely equal parts in a large cast of petty characters who live on the yacht. The film’s title refers to the wrinkles in the skin that form between the eyebrows when you frown, and eventually become permanent, making you look older. The title may also be a reference to our unequal social hierarchies, a topic the film seems to explore.

Explore the last week