A federal court in California has dismissed a lawsuit alleging that the cover artwork of rock band Nirvana's 1991 album "Nevermind" constituted child ...
Elden told CNN in 2008: "Rumor had it that Cobain had the original concept of wanting to show a mother giving birth under water." In 2007, he told the UK's Sunday Times that he found it "kind of creepy that many people have seen me naked ... Both its content and artwork were heralded as seminal rock works, but three years after its release, Nirvana's frontman, Kurt Cobain, died by suicide in Seattle and the remaining members subsequently disbanded.
Spencer Elden accuses the band of profiting from "the lascivious nature of his image" in the photo taken when he was a baby. Now 31, he is appealing the ...
Elden's lawyers argue that the damage done to him is ongoing, and has persisted in the years after he ceased being a minor. The judge allowed Elden's team to file an amended complaint after that flub — but his new ruling doesn't provide that leeway. But Judge Fernando Olguin of the Central District Court in California dismissed Elden's suit with prejudice, ruling that he had waited too long to file suit. Elden says Nirvana's surviving members, Cobain's estate and others have "leveraged the lascivious nature of his image" to market and make millions of dollars off of the famous album. "Most child pornography is traded well into the victim's adulthood," attorney Margaret Mabie said via email. [Spencer Elden](https://www.npr.org/2008/07/23/92833535/once-naked-for-nirvana-now-a-teen-spirit) is appealing the dismissal, his lawyers told NPR, arguing that the judge in the case has misinterpreted the federal child sexual exploitation law known as Masha's law.
Spencer Elden, who was pictured as a baby on the cover of “Nevermind,” argued in his lawsuit that the grunge rock group had engaged in “child pornography.”
Mr. In their motion to dismiss, lawyers for Nirvana said that in 2003, when Mr. Weddle paid Mr. Initially, he appeared to celebrate his part in the classic cover, recreating the moment for the album’s 10th, Elden’s opinion about the photo changed. Elden’s lawyers had missed a deadline to respond to a motion for dismissal by the lawyers for Nirvana. [was picked from among dozens of pictures of babies by the photographer Kirk Weddle](https://milanote.com/the-work/the-designer-of-nirvanas-nevermind-album-cover). Deixler, a lawyer for the defendants, said in a statement that they were “pleased this meritless case has been brought to a swift conclusion.” The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. Stories like this are possible because of our deep commitment to original reporting, produced by a global staff of over 1,700 journalists who have all dedicated themselves to helping you understand the world. District Court for the Central District of California against the estate of Kurt Cobain; the musician’s former bandmates, David Grohl and Krist Novoselic; and Mr. Olguin, wrote in his eight-page ruling that because Mr.
Lawsuit from Spencer Elden who graced the cover of the band's 1991 landmark album "Nevermind" was tossed out by a federal judge.
In a 2003 interview with Rolling Stone, a 12-year-old Elden predicted he would probably “get some money from” his contribution to the album, which went triple diamond and revamped the face of popular rock music on the strength of the smash hit “Smells Like Teen Spirit.” [and recreated](https://nypost.com/2016/09/23/nirvana-baby-recreates-iconic-album-cover-25-years-later/) the famous picture in 2016 to pay homage to the seminal record on its 25th anniversary. [had argued](https://nypost.com/2021/08/25/nevermind-cover-baby-spencer-eldon-sues-nirvana-over-child-pornography/) that the shot of him in the nude swimming towards a dollar bill on a fish hook amounted to child porn.
Spencer Elden's lawsuit against Nirvana claiming the 'Nevermind' art was child pornography was dismissed due to statute of limitations.
But as recently as 2016, he [recreated](https://www.spin.com/2016/09/nevermind-baby-album-cover-25th-anniversary/) the pose and album art in a photoshoot. [filed a lawsuit](https://www.spin.com/2021/08/nirvana-sued-by-nevermind-baby-for-child-pornography/) against [Nirvana](https://www.spin.com/tag/nirvana), the case has been dismissed. Elden is barred from [re-filing the lawsuit](https://www.spin.com/2022/01/nirvana-child-pornography-lawsuit/); however, he will have the opportunity to appeal if he so decides.
A judge has thrown out the lawsuit filed by the person who appeared naked on the cover of Nevermind as a baby, citing the statute of limitations.
Elden [first filed suit against Nirvana in 2021](https://www.vulture.com/2022/01/the-nirvana-baby-claims-nevermind-art-is-porn-sues-nirvana.html#:~:text=The%20Nirvana%20Baby's%20Nevermind%20Porn%20Lawsuit%20Lives%20On,-By%20Rebecca%20Alter&text=Spencer%20Elden%2C%20who%20appeared%20naked,to%20a%20motion%20in%20time.) for child sexual exploitation. [lawsuit from the person who appeared naked](https://www.vulture.com/2022/01/the-nirvana-baby-claims-nevermind-art-is-porn-sues-nirvana.html#:~:text=The%20Nirvana%20Baby's%20Nevermind%20Porn%20Lawsuit%20Lives%20On,-By%20Rebecca%20Alter&text=Spencer%20Elden%2C%20who%20appeared%20naked,to%20a%20motion%20in%20time.) on the cover of Nirvana’s Nevermind as a baby. A Los Angeles judge has thrown out the
Eight-page ruling also prevents Spencer Elden, 31, from filing another lawsuit against the band.
The cover image shows Elden, who was four months old at the time, in a swimming pool reaching for a dollar bill with his genitals exposed. [Terms of use,](https://www.independent.co.uk/service/user-policies-a6184151.html) [Cookie policy](https://www.independent.co.uk/service/cookie-policy-a6184186.html) and [Privacy notice.](https://www.independent.co.uk/service/privacy-policy-a6184181.html) Under this logic, any child pornography producer – such as Masha Allen’s original abuser – could simply wait out the clock and then re-distribute abusive material with impunity. [Privacy policy](https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en) and [Terms of service](https://policies.google.com/terms?hl=en) apply. [which was made in December](https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/nirvana-baby-nevermind-cover-lawsuit-b1981906.html). [earlier dismissed by a California judge ](https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/nirvana-nevermind-baby-lawsuit-b1986442.html)“with leave to amend” in January 2022. [claimed that he was the victim of “child sexual exploitation”](https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/nirvana-baby-nevermind-spencer-elden-b1908573.html) and that the iconic cover art was a child sexual abuse image that had been “knowingly produced, possessed and advertised” by the band. [Sign up](https://amzn.to/32gdyhr) [The New York Times](http://go.redirectingat.com/?id=44681X1458326&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2022%2F09%2F04%2Farts%2Fmusic%2Fnirvana-nevermind-baby-lawsuit.html&sref=https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/nirvana-nevermind-spencer-elden-lawsuit-b2159745.html).
The court says Spencer Elden, now 31, waited for too long to claim that the legendary grunge band sexually exploited him.
For the unversed, the album cover of ‘Nevermind’ is among the most recognized album covers in the world. Elden in 1991 received a platinum copy of the album ‘Nevermind’ along with a teddy bear by Geffen Records. The man, [Spencer Elden](https://meaww.com/nirvana-kurt-cobain-estate-lawsuit-nevermind-album-cover-baby-spencer-elden-child-porn-abuse), had sued the surviving members of the band over child sexual exploitation. The photo was taken by Weddle in 1991 at the Pasadena Aquatic Center in California. Elden had filed three versions of the suit and the judge dismissing the same prevented him from filing a fourth one. The lawsuit named several record labels including drummer Dave Grohl, bassist Krist Novoselic, [Kurt Cobain’s](https://meaww.com/la-late-nirvana-singer-and-courtney-love-daughter-frances-bean-celebrates-her-30th-birthday) estate, and photographer Kirk Weddle.
Spencer Elden, age 31, claimed in his legal papers that the shot of him swimming towards a dollar bill on a fish hook amounted to child porn. US District Judge ...
His family received $200 to place hin the Pasadena Aquatic Center pool for the iconic shot. But he claimed trauma from the image’s widespread circulation. He said Elden had waited far too long to take legal action against several record labels and the band’s drummer Dave Grohl, bassist Krist Novoselic, guitarist Kurt Cobain’s estate and photographer Kirk Weddle.
A man whose photograph as a naked baby was featured on a Nirvana album cover has lost his claim that its use amounted to sexual abuse.
However, US district judge Fernando Olguin ruled that Elden waited too long and that his claim was well beyond the ten-year statute of limitations. The defence had argued that Elden had enjoyed being the “ Spencer Elden said he was unable to ever consent to the photo being taken
A man, who was featured on the front cover of Nirvana's iconic Nevermind album as a baby, has had his lawsuit against the Seattle band dismissed by a judge.
[ BBC, the lawyers](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-62789436) were reported as saying: "he has re-enacted the photograph in exchange for a fee, many times; he has had the album title... tattooed across his chest; he has appeared on a talk show wearing a self-parodying, nude-coloured onesie; he has autographed copies of the album cover for sale on eBay; and he has used the connection to try to pick up women." A man, who was featured on the front cover of Nirvana’s iconic Nevermind album as a baby, has had his lawsuit against the Seattle band dismissed by a judge.
A US judge has dismissed Spencer Elden's claim that an image of him as a naked baby on the 1991 album constituted child sexual abuse.
[In 2015, he told the Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2015/jan/16/thats-me-picture-spencer-elden-nirvana-nevermind): “It is a weird thing to get my head around, being part of such a culturally iconic image. Elden also has a tattoo of the word Nevermind on his chest. But it’s always been a positive thing and opened doors for me. The defendants had previously argued that Elden had “spent three decades profiting from his celebrity as the self-anointed ‘Nirvana Baby’”, including recreating the image for the album’s 15th and 25th anniversaries. The suit was [Nirvana](https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/aug/25/baby-on-nevermind-cover-sues-nirvana-over-child-sexual-exploitation)’s 1991 album Nevermind as a baby, has lost his lawsuit [claiming that the image constituted child sexual abuse](https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/aug/25/baby-on-nevermind-cover-sues-nirvana-over-child-sexual-exploitation).
Kurt Cobain appears in a YouTube screengrab. The federal lawsuit accusing Nirvana of using “child pornography” on the cover of their groundbreaking album “ ...
Elden argued that he should have been able to bring his lawsuit for a decade after any legal violation was discovered by him — including violations discovered after the age of majority — but Olguin disagreed with that reading. [defense’s motion to dismiss](https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/nirvana-skewers-absurd-lawsuit-by-man-who-was-the-naked-baby-on-nevermind-album-child-pornography-claim-is-on-its-face-not-serious/) that, “Elden has spent three decades profiting from his celebrity as the self-anointed ‘Nirvana Baby,'” and recounted Elden’s photo reenactment, his chest tattoo of the album title ‘Nevermind,’ and his talk show appearance wearing a nude-colored unitard. Alternatively, a claim can be brought up to 10 years after the victim reaches age 18. The so-called “Nirvana Baby” will not be permitted to go forward against the band or its late frontman now that a federal court has In the judge’s ruling, he referred to Nirvana’s argument and reasoned that “discovery cannot be suspended indefinitely while a plaintiff is fully on notice that a known person does the same thing to him, in the same manner.” Elden did not dispute that the use of the photo happened more than a decade before his lawsuit was filed, thereby sealing the fate of his claim. Olguin also refused to allow Elden another chance to correct his lawsuit and wrote, “the court is persuaded that it would be futile to afford plaintiff a fourth opportunity to file an amended complaint.” The case is now dismissed with prejudice, which means that Elden cannot refile it so long as the district judge’s order stands. “We are pleased that this meritless lawsuit has been brought to a swift conclusion,” Nary Kim, counsel to Nirvana and Universal Music, said in a statement. Elden has also sold self-autographed copies of the album cover for sale on eBay and according to Deixler, “he has used the connection to try to pick up women.” The court, however, never had a chance to consider those substantive arguments, because the case was dismissed for a procedural error. [recreating the photograph 25 years after](https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-37478523) the release of “Nevermind,” Elden remarked in a video interview, “It’d be nice to have a quarter for every person who’s seen my baby penis.” [given one last chance to fix his complaint](https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/judge-dismisses-lawsuit-accusing-nirvana-of-child-pornography-but-gives-man-who-was-naked-baby-on-album-cover-one-last-opportunity-to-fix-complaint/) last January when a federal judge in California [dismissed the lawsuit](https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.829719/gov.uscourts.cacd.829719.54.0.pdf) alleging that Elden had been subjected to “commercial child sexual exploitation.” Elden, who appeared as a naked baby chasing a one-dollar bill underwater on the album cover Nirvana’s iconic 1991 album “Nevermind,” called the cover photo “shocking” and “sexually seductive” and said he will continue to suffer lifelong damages from its use. Olguin, a Barack Obama appointee, presided over the case, and after allowing Elden multiple opportunities to amend his complaint, dismissed the lawsuit on September 2, 2022 for being time-barred. The federal lawsuit accusing Nirvana of using “child pornography” on the cover of their groundbreaking album “Nevermind” has come to a final end with a denial.
Spencer Elden, who appeared on the Nirvana Nevermind album cover, has lost his lawsuit claiming that the image constituted child sexual abuse.
“Elden has spent three decades profiting from his celebrity as the self-anointed ‘Nirvana Baby’,” Nirvana said in their motion to dismiss. “Spencer’s victimization as a child remains frozen in time,” Elden’s lawyers said in a statement. Spencer Elden, who appeared on the Nirvana Nevermind album cover, has lost his lawsuit claiming that the image constituted child sexual abuse.