Some companies had filed information under the Toxic Substances Control Act saying they made or imported PFAS listed on the TRI. But they didn't file TRI ...
The agency followed up with them and found these firms had used what is called the de minimis exemption. But the EPA has received few reports on PFAS since Congress added these compounds to the TRI in 2019. Many companies have used the option to avoid reporting.
PFAS are used by the oil and gas industry, but a lack of transparency and accountability makes it impossible to know how widespread contamination could be ...
In some states, like Pennsylvania, oil and gas companies are required to disclose complete lists of fracking chemicals to regulators, including ingredients that are withheld from the public as trade secrets. “Mr. Latkanich has raised concerns with Chevron and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection about various issues since 2011,” Chevron spokesperson Deena McMullen said in an emailed statement. In Colorado, for example, 414 million pounds of chemicals used in the state’s fracking wells were left unidentified as “trade secrets” between 2011 and 2021, according to a 2022 report from Physicians for Social Responsibility. Private wells aren’t regulated in the state, so people living near oil and gas sites who are concerned about PFAS currently have no option but to pay for their own testing, which costs around $200 per sample, according to Ng. Latkanich’s drinking water has been plagued with problems since two fracking wells were drilled in his backyard in 2011 and 2012. “But at the same time, you’d be hard pressed to find water in the United States that doesn’t exceed those thresholds.” There’s also evidence that the chemicals are used during initial drilling and other phases of oil and gas extraction, but companies aren’t required to disclose those chemicals, so there’s no way of knowing how widespread the practice is. This is especially troubling for people using private drinking water wells like Latkanich, who tend to live in rural areas where oil and gas extraction takes place. The PFAS in Latkanich’s water have national implications. Last year it was revealed that these chemicals, collectively referred to as PFAS (per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances), have been used in U.S. oil and gas wells for decades. The chemicals don’t break down naturally, so they linger in the environment and human bodies. In 2020, an Environmental Health News investigation found evidence that Latkanich and his son Ryan had been exposed to harmful chemicals like benzene, toluene and styrene.
During the first half of 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continued to make progress on the actions outlined in its PFAS Strategic ...
Finally, EPA is working on setting effluent guidelines and developing analytical methods (EPA’s draft Method 1633) and water quality criteria for PFAS in wastewater discharges. For addressing groundwater contaminated with PFAS, the new HALs may prompt states that have issued, or are in the process of issuing, groundwater cleanup criteria for these PFAS to consider more stringent remediation levels. EPA still plans to issue a proposed rule to designate PFOA and PFOS as Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) hazardous substances. EPA set interim updated lifetime Health Advisory Levels (HALs) of 0.004 parts per trillion (ppt) (or 4 parts per quadrillion) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and 0.02 ppt for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). The previous HALs for PFOA and PFOS were 70 ppt. EPA also established final HALs of 10 ppt for hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and its ammonium salt (GenX chemicals) and 2,000 ppt for perfluorobutane sulfonic acid and its potassium salt (PFBS). Therefore, environmental testing laboratories will have both a challenge and an opportunity to develop improved testing methodologies to accurately quantify concentrations of PFAS at the HAL levels.
Defence has begun tackling the toxic legacy of the firefighting foam used for decades at Northern Territory RAAF base, but some residents say action should ...
"There's been no transparency … but everyone in this town has realised this is a forever chemical, and if we want to live in this town, we're kind of stuck with it," she said. "My patients came in more and more concerned about the fact that the banks wouldn't provide them with loans to expand their businesses, that they had moved to Katherine to escape from pollution elsewhere, had bought a bore property with pristine water coming out of the ground, and had effectively poisoned their children." "It's called the forever chemical and the problem is here in Katherine." Defence has conceded there is "no silver bullet" that would effectively destroy all traces of the "forever chemical" from the base, but it is committed to solving the problem. "The fire training ground and the fire station, they contribute the biggest amount of mass that leaves the base," she said. - Defence admits there is no "silver bullet" in the clean-up of PFAS pollution from its bases